A significant strategic pivot by Anchorage Digital, a federally licensed crypto custody bank, is sending ripples through the institutional stablecoin market. The bank recently advised its institutional clientele to divest from prominent stablecoins such as USDC, Agora USD (AUSD), and Usual USD (USD0), advocating instead for a transition to Global Dollar (USDG). USDG is a stablecoin issued by Paxos and backed by a consortium that includes Anchorage itself. This move, detailed in Anchorage’s new “Stablecoin Security Matrix” report, has ignited widespread debate within the cryptocurrency industry, raising questions about market influence and potential conflicts of interest.
Anchorage’s Rationale and Market Implications
Anchorage’s directive stems from a rigorous evaluation framework. Rachel Andernica, Chief Global Operations Officer at Anchorage, stated that USDC, AUSD, and USD0 no longer meet the bank’s criteria for long-term sustainability. The “Stablecoin Security Matrix” report highlights concerns across several critical areas, including regulatory oversight, the transparency of reserve holdings, and the inherent risks associated with issuer concentration. Notably, the report assigned USDC a low score of 2 out of 5, citing vulnerabilities exposed during the March 2023 Silicon Valley Bank collapse. During that event, approximately 15% of Circle’s cash reserves were held across various banks, temporarily causing USDC to de-peg below one dollar.
Industry Backlash and Ethical Considerations
The announcement immediately drew criticism, particularly regarding the perceived conflict of interest given Anchorage’s involvement in the USDG consortium. Nick Van Ek, the issuer of AUSD, publicly accused Anchorage of disseminating misinformation and failing to disclose its financial ties to USDG. Van Ek characterized the actions as “both frivolous and strange,” questioning the legitimacy of disparaging USDC and AUSD with what he termed “false claims.” This swift industry backlash underscores the intense scrutiny stablecoin issuers face, especially when a major institutional player appears to favor an affiliated asset.
The Evolving Regulatory Landscape
This controversy unfolds amidst an increasingly assertive regulatory environment for stablecoins. The recently passed GENIUS Act in the U.S. Senate aims to establish stringent compliance standards for stablecoin issuers. Should this legislation secure approval from the House of Representatives, it could come into effect as early as July, significantly reshaping the operational landscape for all stablecoin providers. Despite recent positive assessments for USDC, including a “strong” rating from S&P Ratings and a B+ rating from Bluechip, Anchorage maintains that future regulatory harmonization and structural independence are paramount for the long-term viability of stablecoins. Andernica reiterated Anchorage’s commitment to supporting only stablecoins that align with their benchmarks for transparency, independence, and regulatory preparedness.
Anchorage’s strategic re-alignment signals a potential deepening of divisions within the stablecoin sector. As regulatory clarity increasingly materializes, it is beginning to exert a profound influence on institutional preferences and is revealing new fault lines in the digital asset ecosystem. This development could compel other financial institutions to re-evaluate their stablecoin allocations, driving a broader industry shift towards assets perceived as more robust and compliant in an evolving regulatory climate.
Kate specializes in clear, engaging coverage of business developments and financial markets. With a knack for breaking down economic data, she makes complex topics easy to understand.